Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR AHMED versus STATE

Section 302 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the punishment for appreciation of Section 7 evidence, was immediately dropped in the FIR The Medico Legal Report injured police witnesses as well as other police officers. Future witnesses have also been corroborated, while supporting the prosecution's case. The role of the ocular account of the accused was specifically described in the medical legal report and the doctor's statements, which were dismissed before the trial court. All witnesses successfully tested the long test and no evidence was in the record. There is no reason for any of the witnesses to show any misconduct for making false allegations in the trial, there is no reason to doubt the credibility of the evidence of those witnesses who supported the trial case. Was extradited before the trial court in a very natural way while the statements of the witnesses were convincing in nature. And their account holdings can be safely relied on as long as the punishment of the accused is maintained even in the absence of, however, by the pieces of evidence, none of the victims has ever been harmed and against it. The charge was to cause firearm wounds on one of the prosecution's witnesses, although data available on the record proved that the defendant's participation, but the trial court did not consider section 302 (b), the PPC and the Anti-Terrorism Act. Under Section 7 of 1997, the accused had adopted a strict view while convicting the accused, while dismissing the appeal of the accused, the death sentence was lifted by age. Was sentenced to prison, tax advocates from Piplan lawyer