Find a Lawyer

AZIZ KHAN versus STATE

Articles 9 and 20 defined the defendant's defense only as evidence that contradictions were arising in this case and that the prohibited item was not recovered from his personal possession and he was also accused in other cases whose statements date to the same. Had been / was acquitted. It was the responsibility and responsibility of the police officer to issue a warrant or report to the superior officers, but not following the instructions in the Control Section 20 of the Narcotic Substitute Act 1997 was not fatal to the prosecution, though it did give the investigating officer responsibility. Hold on. The presence of the Lady Constable at the raid, after proper investigation by his superiors, was a disciplinary action under the Police Rules, 1934, there was no reason to acquit the accused because it was merely irregular, something to show Was not even on the record. Complaint against other inmates and accused in the house did not designate any of his father or his brothers. In question, being in possession of marijuana, the accused's appeal was dismissed. top advocate from Murree lawyer