Find a Lawyer

ARIF EJAZ versus DIRECTOR GENERAL FIA, ISLAMABAD

Sections 202020, 666, 7487, 8 468, 111 and 9 Cri9 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 1969 Trademarks Ordinance (XIX of 2001), Sections 7 (2), 39, 46 and 117 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) , Article 199 Constitution Petition did not show that the termination of the FIR parties had been registered as a controversial trademark under the FIA authorities, in the circumstances, the applicant was not authorized to file a case. , The matter was not avoided in terms of the agreement, but with respect to the use / misuse of trademarks meant that the FIA authorities had come to the conclusion that no one was against the applicant parties. There is no criminal case, they can have civil rights against each other, if any, against each other, but the guilty citizen can prove the same in the court of jurisdiction, but there is no criminal case. At this time, after registering a trademark in his name, the accused is present against the Agreed Party, seeking a legal solution to a court of competent jurisdiction if his rights are not violated. There is neither a criminal case nor can it be. The respondents were directed to consider the provisions of Section 16969, CRPC and the relevant rules while dealing with the criminal case against the applicant. immigration advocates contact from Amangarh lawyer