Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE

The testimony of the complainant was also confirmed by the motive of the section 302 (b) evidence, charged by the prosecution, the case of the Modif, proved that the body of the accused was recovered. And there was no question of the two sides being closely related, false identities or alternatives, the accused was the nephew of the complainant's real maternal uncle and the complainant had no enmity against the accused on the false execution of the real father killing his son. The real culprit will not leave and especially the real culprit will be involved with Mama's nephew's second witness. Verse was a neighbor. He was an independent witness and there was no enmity, the evidence against both said that the witnesses were trustworthy, which could be believed if he answered the question placed under section 342, CR PC. The answer is the accused's silence. When he wanted the accused to bring his case under section 530, under PPC, under section 302 (c), PPC, he was charged with proving the same allegation, because he neither No defense witnesses testified, nor did they make any allegations. A prescription about her illness / insanity has been put on the record, alleging that she killed the 5-year-old innocent child without a minor, there was no harm in her favor, Through the trial, the accused was convicted and sentenced, the sentence given to the accused was verified and positively answered regarding the murder. famous lower court advocate from Pasroor lawyer