MEHFOOZ ALAM versus STATE
Section 302 (b) and 460 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The complainant in whose house his son was killed was himself a witness to the injured eye. The eyewitnesses, however, were the natural witnesses to the incident, which they clearly stated. The light of the light was on the spot where the blood-stained ground was collected from the spot. Medical evidence confirmed the molecular version of the forensic science laboratory is positive The courts below correctly evaluated the evidence. There was no shortage of honor accusations. The lesser sentence was not guilty of any wrongdoing in the law or the fact, so the accused was refused accordingly for appeal by the Supreme Court to guarantee interference.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Ukba lawyer