Find a Lawyer

MST. SARWARI BEGUM versus MUNAWAR SULTANA

Section 42 of the Qunoon Shahadat (Sun 10, 1984, 1984, 1984), Arts 117 and 118 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Vol. As well as a report on the exhibition's action. The site's plan to display the encroachments could not be relied on because it did not comply with the orders of the High Court (Lahore) and the MK because it was prepared by a gurdwara and not a revenue officer. And Patwari acknowledged that no notice of delimitation proceedings was issued to the defendants and that the report was not prepared unilaterally behind the defendants - the defendants locally objected to identifying the disputed property. An application was made for the appointment of the commission and the local commission report clearly states I want the citizens and Construction, now in the area, and the demarcation of land title claimant claimant claimant was not possible to identify the source of the disputed territory. The party of the defendants was admitted and the name of the predecessor was shown in the interest of the defendants in the site plan as the plaintiffs failed to exclude the petition to prove their title through sufficient and credible evidence, lasting The impeachment decrees of the courts were set aside for lack of reason. By the High Court \ r \ n \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Naseerabad lawyer