Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE

Definition of Section 9 (b) evidence was also observed by a police officer for the recovery of narcotic drugs, which, during investigation, took the unnecessary stance under which he declared the accused innocent. Was denied. In the prosecution case against the accused, there was confusion, two witnesses presented by the prosecution had clearly dismissed the accused's innocence, which was also serious against the prosecution's allegations against the accused. The two witnesses, who were police officers, made contradictory statements about the pattern. Such contradictions in which the cannabis was recovered had rendered the charge against the accused substantially dubious that the State Counsel had admitted that the State had, after thorough investigation, investigated the matter through its investigative agency. It is reported that the accused was innocent and was named in column number 2. The challan was important in the State Council, it was alleged that the accused was innocent, the prosecution had failed to prove the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the trial court had tried and convicted him, and he was charged. Was acquitted and released. \ r \ n \ r \ n how to become a advocate from Havelian lawyer