MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus STATE
The case against the co-accused, sections 156 (1) (8) (14) (82) and 178, was that it contacted the exporters and thus facilitated the attempt to export counterfeit cigarettes from the CID Act section. Was punishable under Article 156 (82). (1) Neither the effect of the Customs Act, 1969 found that the accused had committed the offense under section 156 (1) of the Customs Act 1969 nor any of the commission of the offense under this section. Has been convicted. According to Section 156 (1) (82) of the Customs Act, 1969, the proceeds of support of the sentence punishable by the accompanying accused were found not to be perpetuated in an unconstitutional decision. The decisions were set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Pasroor lawyer