Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

In section 42 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the legal effect of the mutation in the title of section 42 law in this testimony (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 118 property, the plaintiff filed a declaration against her two brothers that her father had This property is owned by. His brother was divided equally between the three brothers, one brother claimed the claim while the other claimed that he had acquired the title in the suit land by mutation and whatever the land under it. Was transferred to the federal government. The decree passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (General) suit was approved, but the order was set aside in the appeal. The plaintiff presented her testimony to her uncle and first cousin, who testified to the plaintiff's version, on the other hand, the defendant failed to establish his defense, but the appellate court resolved the matter in a conciliatory manner. That after the testimony of the witnesses, who were closely related to the equal parties, the use of the evidence was forwarded to the plaintiff's Order of Revenue Officer to approve the change, therefore, it was obliged to present the material to the defendant. Based on the controversial mutation, but he could not do so, the mutation got no title and only Ryurtn of production can, therefore, could not be the basis of the claimant to be welcomed. best law firms from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer