MESSRS TEXZONE versus THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, EXPORT COLLECTORATE, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI
Section 5 Customs Act (IV of 1969), the deferred default on two dates of the section 196 hearing and the appeal for appeal was argued by the appellant's lawyer that although his name was printed on the cause list, he was not. Could do. Apparently, since no notice was issued to inform him, and he had moved out of town, he could not see the list of reasons, the justification exists, the name of the parties' lawyer in the cause list Printing was enough notice and it was his duty. The lawyers had to go through the list of reasons and there was no need to issue further notice when the matter was decided for a hearing, no explanation was given for not appearing on the two dates of the hearing, for late condolences. No case was presented or the request for reinstatement of appeal was dismissed. r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Gambet lawyer
