Find a Lawyer

MST. SARA BAI versus IQBAL

Proof of fraudulent transaction in section Ben By means of the preparation of the original title document, the plaintiff claims not to be the father of the plaintiff claiming that he had purchased the suit property in the name of the plaintiff and presented evidence that the suit The properties have been acquired. Through it, he also disclosed with his funds and his other properties and income that the defendant failed to prove that at the time of the purchase of the suit properties, he had sufficient money to buy the same plaque deposited by the defendant. That the original lease consisted of was the production of works based on the original lease, not the absence of proof of payment, for the purpose of owning the property. There was no dispute that the defendant owned the property but the plaintiff claimed that he had purchased the property and kept the defendant in his possession. The joint family business was found to be unfounded, the plaintiff also specifically appealed for that purpose in her case, and her testimony also testified that the suit property was purchased by the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff because accordingly The order of the Benjamidr suit was pronounced. female advocates from Astore lawyer