Find a Lawyer

GHAFOORAN BIBI versus IFTIKHAR AHMAD

O XLI, R 23, 0 XLIII R 1 (u) and section 105 (2) of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877) were appealable against the remand of section 42 remand until the trial court settled the remand. Later, the verdict was filed by the plaintiff / Daughters except the daughter of the deceased's son, who was confirmed in favor of the inheritance, only on the issue of the determination of the share of the deceased's legal heritage in the trial court's consent. I was remanded to trial by the trial court declaring the daughters entitled to inheritance. The deceased's property was stolen by the plaintiff's son on appeal but he was also denied that the remand order by the appellate court was for limited purposes only in determining the parties' shares and any search of the remaining matters. Was not filed by the appellate court. The defendants rightly challenged that the trial court's finding and their appeal were properly and correctly decided by which the appellate court had ruled on all matters. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bolan lawyer