Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR AND 53 OTHERS versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, SAHIWAL,

Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Proprietary Rights, Districts Shops from District Collectors were constructed by the Municipal Committee on Government Land and were given to applicants through open auction, implementing rental agreements. After the import started, the committee later approached the Board of Revenue for grant of proprietary rights in favor of the applicants as well as the land, since the land is owned by the Government Board of Revenue, so that the applicants Create a case for sale through a private contract in favor of Since they had the pre-emptive right to buy the land, the municipal committee withheld the order of the Board of Revenue before the High Court and, after being in constitutional jurisdiction, the legal status of the Board of Revenue before the High Court could be charged. Set aside the order passed by. Question: The municipal committee obtained the necessary permission from the district collector, who was a grantee, and after that, shops were built. The applicants participated in the auction proceedings and executed the necessary rental agreements in favor of the municipal committee; for all practical purposes, the applicants were the tenants of this committee and could not make a contradictory claim against its true dispute. If any, applicants had no locus standi to approach the Board of Revenue for transfer of disputed land / shops between the municipal committee and the Board of Revenue, as the shops were constructed by the municipal committee and so on. , It is an irregularity caused by the District Revenue Authorities approve the request, provincial authority female advocates from Thul lawyer