ZAHID MAHMOOD THROUGH ATTORNEY versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER
In the previous Order of Section 12, keeping the applicants' request aside, it was stated that no notice was taken on it as they did not reside at the address of the applicant through the banking court while the applicant's nephew. Rely on the allegedly received summons. And in the two newspapers it was permissible to declare that the envelope had not returned to the banking court, either the applicant's nephew was served or was presented unsafe by the Arti Party as there was no opportunity for proof preparation. Such a request could not be decided only after the parties had heard, the Banking Court was arbitrarily and arbitrarily exercising its discretion while refusing to provide the parties with an opportunity to record the evidence, the High Court said. Keeping the unidentified order aside, presenting the cases to the banking court and racking up the evidence of the parties Directed to decide the application after the fire. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Digri lawyer
