MRS. SHAMIM AKHTAR versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
Article 10 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), 0 XLI, R 22 Leave for defense of three petitions by three different defendants, after the dismissal of the petition filed by the first respondent, pass the order against all the defendants. ? Prior to prosecuting the leave application, the banking court was under the legal obligation to decide pending applications. The second and third defendants condemned the untimely order passed during the leave petitions, saying that the two defendants were invalid under the law, the decree had already been finalized against the defendants. Nevertheless, do not file an appeal or object in any way: The High Court, while postponing the injunction against the second and third defendants, directed the Banking Court to decide their leave requests first and then The case of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer
