Find a Lawyer

SABIR ALI WASEEM versus STATE

Section 427 Explosive Detectives Act (VI of 1908), Sections 4 and 5 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (b) and (d) Defining Evidence Identifying Police Locations The evidence of the accused was inadmissible. Since no information was discovered as a result of the information received, the recovery of arms and ammunition from the suspect's possession was also unrelated, as it was not shown that the inquiry officer, who had recovered, was commissioned. I was used to it. It was stated that the arms and ammunition had nothing to do with the case. The anecdotal evidence of the prosecution's two witnesses did not encourage confidence because of the reasons that their names were not listed in the FIR. Wooten did not identify by any document that the witnesses had arrived at the scene or they had referred the incident to the police. Thesis issued his National Identity Card or any other document relating to his identity to the Inquiring Officer or to the Magistrate. Before the trial court did not prepare these witnesses, a mysterious accusation was made in the circumstances and his accomplices were not the prosecution witnesses, but they did not present their characteristics to the police and Nor did the police find it necessary to know that such conduct by the witnesses and the police doubted their truth and authenticity, the evidence of the identity parade was useless, nor the accused in the parade identified as witnesses. At the time of the identification, it was revealed in what context they were identified property advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer