Find a Lawyer

ABDUL-SATTAR versus STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337 (F i), 224, 248 and 249 Guarantees, Section 497, CR refusing to translate PPC, delay in filing FIR in FIR Was fully stated and stated, it appears that the competent religions had to delay the filing of the FIR, otherwise, in the presence of the pernicious material available on the record, the accused connected with the crime. There was ample material available on the record to do so and there is a reasonable basis that the defendant is eligible for a crime that could lead to his imprisonment. Providing 10-year bail in a guaranteed offense was a right and not a favor, while in the non-guaranteed offenses there was no right to bail, but Section 497 of the Concession, CRPC granted non-bailable offenses. Was divided into sections (i) the conviction of the death penalty, life imprisonment or ten years imprisonment and (ii) the acceptance of bail in non-bailable offenses falling into another category, was a rule and an exception was denied. Under 242424, the PPC has sentenced to ten years imprisonment and that is the same as in the prohibited clause 749 of. The delay in the CRPC trial was no longer a valid basis for the grant of bail in a non-bailable offense, however, if it was not explained, the law would amount to misconduct and It can be considered as a legitimate place of guarantee. The accused did not present any material in support of his argument that the reason for the delay in the trial cannot be attributed. It is available to reasonably believe that the accused was guilty of 10 years imprisonment and was not entitled to a bail waiver. law websites from Rawalpindi lawyer