GHULAM RASOOL SHAHZAD versus MUHAMMAD SAEED
The special agreement that the agreement denies the execution of the contract in section 12 law, in the testimony (10 of 1984), Article 117 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 100 suit, is that The claimant did not purchase the stamp. The paper in his presence; and that there was a Cue contractual plaintiff whose testimony as a witness was honorable that such a minor witness had purchased the stamp paper. And that he and a minor witness were contracted by a lawyer by the name of M. Held: the plaintiff had failed to be excluded because of the evidence placed on it, the plaintiff testifying to his testimony as to such material contradictions. The plaintiff was not in a position to disclose its existence. 100 Any basis stated in the 100, CPC which justifies interference with the concurrent decree of the courts has been declared below the second appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sanghar lawyer
