Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (b)) Appreciation of Evidence - Although the complainant / prosecutor's witness was an occasional witness, but he fully explained his presence at the scene of the incident, Syed successfully placed the witness at the scene of the incident. A cross-examination examination was conducted in relation to the presence of the three witnesses. There is no previous enmity or animosity to falsely execute the three witnesses. The incident was a daylight and people were present in the bazaar where the incident took place, it cannot be said that the incident was absent. The three witnesses were not related, the single accused was accused, they were both killed. And the injured prosecution opened fire on the witness, eyewitnesses could not be declared as false witnesses, leaving the real culprit, especially when the witnesses were not uncommon towards him, with one of the eyewitnesses having a firearm wound and It was examined on medical grounds that there was no possibility of any accident as a result of the accusations, and how the prosecution's testimony He was not charged with hostility or intent. Eyewitnesses told those involved in the false allegations in the case, the story was quite natural and no exaggeration was witnessed by the prosecution's witnesses who recovered the pistol, which was permanent in relation to the location and the manner in which it was recovered. Recovery Affected Weapons Recovery and Forensic Report Science Lab famous supreme court advocate from Hariwala lawyer