Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ

Section 13 Removal of Tenant Implementation Procedure Respondents were expelled from the premises In compliance with the eviction order, respondents applied for restitution of possession on the basis that any evacuation orders were approved against them. Was not appealed and the appeal was restored by the controller of rent, the appellate court ordered the restoration of possession, although no date had been set for submission of rent arrears. The payer was found guilty of failing to comply with a rental balance order before It was ordered to be submitted on the 15th of the following month, but the withdrawal order was approved, although in the future rent could be replaced by default, the rent controller had in mind The plea deal was done without negligence, which resulted in the defendant's negligence against the defendant. Respondent did not work for which no evacuation order was approved. No defaults for any order sanctioned against him for submission of rent cannot be accepted and in the notice of guarantee on possession warrant It is reported that the second respondent removed the luggage on the spot and the second respondent's son and a security guard, who were then shown the warrant, removed the machinery and confiscated the applicant. The seizure was illegally snatched and the applicant was delivered, but his nephew seized all the mushrooms on the spot. The following Eden in order to restore the removed for recycling Pakistan, top advocate family court from Punch lawyer