Find a Lawyer

RAFIULLAH versus STATE

Section 319 ????? Testimony of the evidence The 27th, who was a lineman in Wapda working on the electric pole, suffered a power shock and died, the accused, who was responsible for supervising the work, in the capacity of line superintendent, Has been charged with a crime of less than 5 years. 319, In order to establish a PPC accuracy criminal offense, two components were necessary. None of the two cases that existed were Mains Re and Actos Rea. The matter had already worked on the two poles immediately before working on the third superintendent; it remained in place and did not know when the first two poles were located. How was the pole supplied? He did not even have to assume that if it was the accused who instructed the deceased to climb the pole, then it was in his power and since the two poles already, the deceased worked. When there was no electricity supply, it can be estimated that there would be no electricity supply at the third pole. The lineman / deputy duty had to take precautionary measures by installing groundwater which was not done. All the witnesses in the court had confessed that when the victim climbed over the pole, he was not wearing rubber. Gloves cannot be set on the record of any negligence in the circle, and if anything, it was due to the death of himself, in the absence of any will, intention or misconduct, and when accused of a criminal act. If it was not attributed, then his sentence and sentence was not worth hearing and the sentence which the trial court had pronounced against the accused stood aside and the accused was acquitted of the charge. immigration advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer