Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD AHMED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS

R3 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 (2) Constitutional Applicants Transfer to the petitioner demanded that the appointment of the defendant by way of transfer to deputation was illegal and liable to be canceled. Can be given. Identify any illegality in the deployment and appointment of the respondents. By law, a public servant of the province can always be discharged to perform service under the authority and on the contrary, nothing was on record. It could be explained how the defendant's case is lacking. The designated qualification was arbitrary to post a public servant against a public office and should not be used in a discretionary or hypothetical manner by the authority within the jurisdiction of the Government, but should only be in accordance with the law in the interest of the Good Governance Petitioner. ? The defendants were civil servants, and were subject to the terms and conditions of the transfer and posting service. E cannot be challenged by the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court because the matter is subject to Article 12 (2) of the Constitution by the Special Service Tribunal. Will be in jurisdiction. list of advocates from Pirpai lawyer