Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IZHARUL HAQ versus STATE

Sections 2?2 (b), 7 33) AI (I) and 7 evidence ??? F (i) Reduction of evidence definition cases In the sentencing case immediately the FIR complainant / injured witness filed Was the real brother of the deceased and the other witness of the prosecution. The complainant's nephew, but he had no enmity or any strong motive to engage in false accusations in the incident, as it was a rare incident that such a close relationship would have left the real killer and his By substituting, witnesses were subjected to a lengthy investigation. Nothing can be defeated by their testimony so far as the account of the account is concerned, the presence of witnesses on the occasion also appears natural. The Ocular Account has been welcomed through medical evidence, evidence of recovery and positive reports from a fire arm specialist. In the dispute of liberty, however, the reasoning for not mentioning the complainant's injuries could not be relied upon, it had no power because there was a mention here that not only the FIRs were injured, but the investigating officer's prosecution. The Inquisitr report produced by CBI also proved beyond any doubt against the accused, however, he could not be sentenced to death because there were circumstances which led to his mitigation. Reasons; The first motivation that led to the dispute was not proven by the prosecution, as it was also eliminated in 1995, when the question came up in 1997 and nothing happened during those two years. Second, the use of a pure or water course caused the event to happen and thirdly, it was a single shot advocate from Jehanian lawyer