CHAUDHRY MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SME BANK LIMITED THROUGH CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT
Section 22 (1) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Delays in Appeals 5 and 29 (2) Appeal, Insult to application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1908, Applicable Rules Under section 29 of the Act it is stated that where different periods of limitation have been specified in a particular or local law, then the provisions of section # do not apply. A 90-day period has been fixed under Article 156 of the Act, 1908. Appeal to the High Court, while the present case is run under the provisions of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, which is a special law and has 30 days to file the first appeal before Section 22 (1) High. Determines the duration. Against the judgment and decree passed by the Banking Court, the special law of the court provided different limits for filing the first appeal in the High Court as opposed to the common law. Therefore, neither section 5 of the Limitation Act 1908 nor the application was in the present case. Qualified and not Attentive; Thus, the application filed under it was misunderstood, disqualified and not retained. The High Court dismissed such request and dismissed the present appeal as is time constrained. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
