Find a Lawyer

AMJAD MASIH versus STATE

Section 2 (b (b)) immediately dismissed any FIR without prejudicial evidence, any opportunity for discussion and consultation with others to be involved in false accusations; All material details of the incident were detailed in the FIR, so that the complainant's presence and other prosecutor's testimony at the time of the incident could not be doubted. The defendant did not present any evidence in defense and even one of Brady's men was in the pool. He did not even bother to appear before the trial. The trial court proved in his favor the testimony of the prosecution through the statements of eyewitnesses to submit his so-called false involvement. Occurrence cannot be doubted because they both belonged to the place where the incident took place. The witnesses were natural. The witnesses cannot be called as witnesses and the witness of the occasion. No contradiction or potential contradiction of the long case was identified. The eyewitness claims are presented by the eyewitnesses and the medical evidence fully supports the prosecution's version, which deserves full credibility, lacks the true and legitimate motive, or even proves the murder charge Inability of the prosecution did not affect the execution of the death penalty in the case of a murder; if the prosecutor was otherwise able to prove his case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, then the argument of the charge that he could be sentenced Deserved because Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dandot lawyer