Find a Lawyer

MST. ITRAT ZAHIDA AND OTHERS versus PRESIDENT, A.B.L.

AXXII, Rule 1 & 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Determination of Procedure Survival Service / Civil Rights, Implementation of Advancement in the Interest of Applicants Employed with Plaintiff Bank Was dismissed. The Labor Court of Misconduct set aside the dismissal order but the Labor Appellate Tribunal allowed the bank's appeal and the order of the Labor Appellate Tribunal to be revoked was rejected by the High Court in the constitutional petition, which was dismissed on that basis. It was reported that the employee died during his death. The petition filed by the petitioners also stated that the proceedings could not be denied due to death in the interest of their predecessor. The valid question is whether, after the death of the claimant or the applicant, the proceedings were primarily Depending on the process, any action may fail. The death of a party, but the cause of action, can survive its death. A civil death did not mean whether it was criminal or civil, whether it was by nature of proceedings. Labor sought to enforce its services / civil rights in the interest of the applicants to determine survival The Labor Court considered the department's dismissal as a result of testimony during the department proceedings. Was given and restored. The Labor Appellate Tribunal set aside the Labor Court's decision and it was challenged through a constitutional petition; if a constitutional petition was allowed, the Labor Appeal Tribunal ruled that the Labor Court would re-establish the foregoing interest. The order was restored, even after the employee's death list of advocates from Shikarpur lawyer