MADAD KHAN versus STATE
Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Guarantee, was allegedly hurt on the complainant's right elbow due to a refusal of a firearm by the accused, but it cannot be ignored that he 2/3. Repeated the bar and then the fire was extinguished. His target suspect, under the circumstances, intended to kill the complainant, weapons were also recovered, a single person was named responsible for hurting the complainant, almost a year had passed, but the case. The hearing did not conclude that the bail application was dismissed as directed. Due to the strange facts and circumstances of the case, the trial court will have to close the case within the stipulated time.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Jamshoro lawyer