Sections 497 and 540 of a Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302, strictly denied bail for more than ten dates, but the case could not proceed and the witness waited patiently and tried to persuade the witness's patience with the prosecution and defense. If not demanded, the benefit can be taken only if the witnesses fail to cause delay and extend the imprisonment. If witnesses in jail appear on various dates and are not examined, the absence of their guarantee cannot be justified in the absence of bail as the same principle applies when bail is not accepted as a matter of fact. It may have been, but the trial case was considered on the basis of extraordinary delays in supporting the trial court, prosecutor, prosecutor and lawyer of the trial, the settlement of the case and the prosecution witnesses as well as the accused. In no way can this situation be termed as satisfactory, if at all, to sustain the inconvenience. If the holders pay their obligations properly and with proper diligence, the full responsibility for the delay cannot be placed on the shoulders of the prosecution witnesses, it has been alleged, in these circumstances the bail was not entitled to be released, The bail application filed by the accused was dropped accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
