Find a Lawyer

HAJI ALTAF AHMED versus HAJI AHMED DIN

Sections 13 (3) (a) (ii) and 15 Removal of a Tenant Personally as Required Second Appellant's questions were received by the Defendant through a rental agreement with the Defendant for a period of 11 months. ? The terms of the aforesaid rental agreement were that the premises of the defendant for personal necessity or by his legal heirs will not be vacated by the appellant in question, after the death of the predecessor in the interest of the defendant, the tenant. Retained and rental work was performed between the various agreements / parties, but it was stated that no condition was mentioned in any of the rental actions, the withdrawal request filed by the respondents was simultaneously. Accepted by the Rent Controller and Appellate Authority stating that the stipulated period of expiration Eden was ended. 11 months stated that the circumstances, under the circumstances, ceased to exist even otherwise, in a situation that was inherently in violation of the provisions of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959, which the landlord personally required. The right to evict was not granted on the basis, it could not be declared a legal condition, even if mutually agreed upon such condition, the landlord could evict the tenant for personal necessity. Deprivation cannot have a lasting effect, if such a need arises later, especially when in subsequent agreements, it is said that There was no unanimity enhanced if the search was protected by the apylynt / rent. West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Appeal also for the first time under section 13 (3) (a) (i) of the Ordinance 1959 online advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer