Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus STATE

Section 439 and 494 of the Control of Narcotic Materials Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c), dismissing the request for a review of the transfer of the case filed by the District Attorney under Section 494, CR PC had gone. The trial court held that the withdrawal of the drug case was a violation of public policy and that no notification was issued by the government in this regard, under which the accused filed a review against the trial court's order not effective. Under which the trial court refused to allow prosecution for eviction. The trial, supported for passionate reasons, was not justified in presenting any justification at trial for the trial, nor was it illegal or a false trial court, / petition. The payer, that he may be a victim of discrimination, should not only be justice, but should also be seen as the High Court ordered the withdrawal of the appeal from the sessions judge / special judge's court, resulting in the second additional session judge / special judge, The control of narcotic substances will be transferred to the court, which will take further action in this case. In accordance with the law family advocate from Talamba lawyer