DILDAR HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 9 (c) Testimony of Evidence Both the prosecution witnesses who allegedly witnessed the restoration did not indicate the time when the raiding proceedings took place and the recovery did not take effect. The timing of the incident was not understandable from the record, which was demolished when the statement of the prosecutor's testimony was filed in court, the real basis of the prosecution case was not presented to the criminal property, ie, the drug case. Serious suspicions were found and the verdict was dismissed and the accused was acquitted of the charge. And he was released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Kot Bunglow lawyer
