MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus MST. MURADI THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
O XLI, R 17 Appellant and his lawyer's non-appearance when the appeal for the Appellant to be heard by the Counsel, which appeared only on a date, has demanded several adjournments before the Court. That the appeal was also granted for a regular hearing in his absence and for the date of postponement of the hearing, it was specifically decided that the appeal was listed in the regular list of reasons but the appellant's counsel No postponement was requested by either obtaining or applying for any deferment through advance management. On the day of the appeal hearing, both the appellants were heard. And his lawyer, who was clearly in front of the Supreme Court, did not appear in the court, nor was the case filed by the Supreme Court in the court nor the appellant on the case and the appellant on the bench. Submitted by a lawyer and presented to their lawyer, or otherwise make appropriate arrangements for the appellant's re-counsel to present arguments The court failed to assist the appeal, therefore, was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
