Find a Lawyer

BARKHURDAR THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus MUHAMMAD ZAFAR HASSAN SHAH

Section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 (3), the second proviso suit declaration that the plaintiffs claimed that their foreclosure purchased the defendant's predecessor in interest-bearing interest in the registered sale deed. But it was not sold. Included in the revenue record, as a result, the seller continued to be recorded as the owner and after the transfer of the property to the accused who sold the property to some other person, his trial and appeal were denied. Was the claimant's obligation obligatory? The mutation has been confirmed and whether his failure has given him another right in the title of subsection (3) of section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, it was not necessary to give information if the right or interest was obtained. ? The plaintiffs were wrongfully convicted by the courts below for inactivity of the sub-registrar and the courts, by notifying the relevant officer within three months of the registration of the document by a registered document which had the duty of the respective sub-registrar. ? lawer from fb area from Khanewal lawyer