Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 396 and 34 offenses (Enforcement Hood Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (4) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 of the Crimes (Enforcement) Ordinance) VI 1979: Definition of evidence In this case, the sole witness had improved his evidence from his first statement in which he did not name the accused nor assigned him any role. Went on to say that the witness was untrustworthy and that his earlier statement was inconsistent with the statement and needed to be considered if he said that the prosecution's witnesses' evidence was in keeping with it. Gone Then, there was nothing left to the prosecution to provide the witness with oral evidence, in which case the accused was insufficient to engage with the evidence of the crime. The identification test can be used as a piece of evidence. , A strong piece of evidence in the form of ocular testimony of the prosecutor's witness, has already been discharged, in that case no solid piece of evidence was spared, only the basis of conviction on the verification piece of evidence, the identification test, no weight. Raised, under the circumstances, the prosecution did not take any evidence to prove that the accused had produced gold chains. The alleged sellers said that the golden chains did not support the prosecution's case because it had explicitly stated that the accused had not brought the chains before the prosecution, beyond any reasonable doubt, to prosecute the accused. Had failed to prove and the accused was acquitted, giving him the benefit of the doubt and there was a matter of confirmation. Dismiss registration advocate from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer