Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAHIM versus BAKHT MUHAMMAD

Section 7 F7F (ii) (iii) (v) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-appeal against Evidence, The benefit of the doubt is the delay in recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses injured After the end of the pressure on the trial, nine persons were acquitted while two persons were sentenced by the trial court and sentenced to 4 years imprisonment. The High Court accepted the appeal and both the accused were taken by the complainant. It was released that the prosecution had proved its case and the trial court correctly pronounced the two defendants had varied the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses And their statements contradicted each other on material points; prosecutors' testimony was not immediately recorded to link the accused to the commission of a crime to improve their statements before the trial court. Which was recorded after considerable delay and testimony. Failing to explain the delay, the High Court considered this fact to be factual, the statements of the prosecution witnesses were not credible because it raised doubts about their fact that the complainant suppressed the accused's injuries to both the accused. It was justified to be acquitted because the trial court acquitted nine persons on the basis of the same evidence. Both were found guilty Supreme Court refused to interfere with the High Court's dismissal decision, which refused to appeal top civil advocates from Wazirabad lawyer