W.T.AS. NOS. 92/KB TO 97/KB, 87/KB TO 91/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 16TH FEBRUARY, 2006. versus W.T.AS. NOS. 92/KB TO 97/KB, 87/KB TO 91/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 16TH FEBRUARY, 2006.
Cancellation of assessment order by the First Appellate Authority for alleged unauthorized representation of a lawyer before the Assessing Officer in response to legal proceedings in response to Sections 16 (3) and 16 (5) / 23/17 Assessments. Assets were authorized to participate in the Wealth Tax Assessment process, otherwise it wasted no time and energy unless it had a legitimate intention or assessment of both assets. There was no personal benefit in participating in the proceedings. Evidence of the circumstance was not considered justifiable, and it was assessed on a case that dismissed the appellate authority's order dismissing the appellate tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
