AKHTAR HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 561A, 347 and 173 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (6), filed an FIR through complaints Was investigated by the Judicial Magistrate and the interim report was submitted, the inquiry officer's end was agreed and his report was accepted and after submitting the interim report, notice of the crime was taken. The report was still pending if the final report was submitted over a period of time, provided that clause (b) of section (1) under section (c) could not be revoked and the magistrate could not. ? Yah after accepting the final report, the investigation of serious crime can not be declared to be void. Not only where the investigation was conducted in connection with an unrecognizable offense, but also during the same transaction, which was also alleged to have committed a confessional offense as well, to submit a final report. There was also no violation of the T Police Order 2002, as there was no transfer or change of investigation by the police officers under the Police Order 2002, if the remaining part of the investigation was completed and a final report was submitted by another officer. He himself would not make the illegal make-up illegal, the PC did not even have to send a case after recording the evidence during the trial from the magistrate, but it allowed him to take any action. In the sent to the sessions court, the order did not demand interference order, was dismissed, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Mingora lawyer