Find a Lawyer

TANVEER KAUSAR versus MANAGING DIRECTOR P.I.A.C. AND ANOTHER

Sections 3 (b) and 5 (1) (A) of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), after the charge sheet against the appellant was dropped on the charge sheet, the appellant was dismissed from the service. It was her consent to his consent. The brother tampered with the marks sheet of the BA (Pass) Examinations and Intermediate Certificate for obtaining a job for his brother in the department, though it was only a matric inquiry that was against the appellant, but without the inquiry committee. Reported an appellant or case related to it. Opportunity to defend the allegations, a disqualification inquiry was completed and the appellant was denied the right to defend. No document was attached to the statement of charge or the charge sheet alleging it. Was that he tampered with the appellant. False and unreasonable charge sheet was issued to the appellant, who had no legal justification to pay the appellant major fines, during the course of the inquiry, any documents or oral evidences were presented before the Inquiry Committee that To prove that the tampering with the educational certificate was made by the appellant, nor is there any evidence that the appellant's guilt could be proved even by the two prosecutor's witnesses in their statements Had confirmed that the applicant's documents were found to be valid. The order charge sheet, which was to be signed / issued by the inquiry officer / inquiry committee, under section 5 (1) (a) of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, was issued and issued by an officer Gone online advocate from Mandra lawyer