Find a Lawyer

KHALID FAHEEM, EX-ASSISTANT MANAGER, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES AND PRODUCTION GOVT. OF PAKISTAN

Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Appellants are dismissed from the job after the charge sheet and investigation against them on the Anti-Corruption and Misconduct Inquiry Committee, the method described in the letter Did not inquire by car The procedure of departmental inquiry issued by the then chairman was also not followed but a copy of the inquiry report was not provided before the appellant was sentenced to be removed from service which was against the principle of natural justice. ? Appellant could not be held responsible for these proceedings. Others' misleading and commissioning of the question was answered against the appellant, which was not a legal inquiry. The witness, who was in charge of the store, stated clearly that the appellant had nothing to do with the purchase and purchase of the material and was clearly In view of the kit. Evidence available on record, the appellant cannot be held liable and cannot be awarded the same sentence, the restraining order for removal from the job was set aside, the authorities were instructed to comply. Routinely conduct regular investigations against the appellant according to the rules. tax advocates from Jhal Magsi lawyer