Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN versus THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI

Sections 3, 5 and 6 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), dismissing section 4 of the appeal against the appellant, were dismissed on the charge that he, as the work inspector, employed the employee. Recommended the employee's retirement papers twice. ???? Personal hearing was demanded because of his control and the loss of public appellant, but no opportunity was provided for the appellant, under the circumstances the opportunity to bring his defense on record was not lost. There is a serious irregularity which resulted in a large sentence of dismissal. The appellant, could not be sustained, the service tribunal accepted the appeal, imposed an improper order dismissing the appellant and instructed the respondents to restore the appellant from the date of the dismissal case, however, Remanded to Authorities to Investigate, Provides Appellant Appropriate Opportunity During Strictly Self-Defense Inquiry \ r \ n \ r \ n best law firms from Chak Jhumra lawyer