Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF versus MUHAMMAD JAVED AKHTAR

O XXXVII, RR 1 & 2 and O IX, R 13 Procedure Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 489F Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 522 Termination of Former Order To Take Advantage of Civil and Criminal Treatment Together Applicants applied for It was prosecuted for recovery on the basis of the check, which jumped on the score as the plaintiff took advantage of criminal remedies under sections 489F, PPC, and XXXVII, RR 1 and 2. The CPC did not maintain a lawsuit against it. The High Court claimed that civil suit and criminal proceedings are two different remedies which have different consequences provided by law, such as in case of a crime, was punished while through the civil suit, the recovery proceedings were initiated. And the amount established was paid, recovered, so both treatments, together with no overlapping, could be used by the person who provided such remedies through law subsection (3). Was. CT522A, CRPC provided that Section 489F could not obstruct the filing of an FIR under PPC, even though the aforesaid section did not bar civil suits. Can go Civil or criminal proceedings have begun with different consequences, they can be exploited in different ways and, more often than not, a man should not be bothered twice, in which case the application will not apply. About a year after the former's demise was filed, the partial order was expressly barred by the appellate court-approved non-interference order. pakistani advocates Thul lawyer