Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 458, 398 and 393 bail, the complainant's party did not know the complainant's party, but the complaining party did not know the accused card associate who was on the spot. Found out about. Some unidentified persons reported to the complainant the record of the case was completely silent about the source through which the complainant found out about the identity of the accused, according to the prosecution's case, among other co-accused. The accused had committed the crime in the house of the complainant. The robbery, but the weird accused managed to escape, leaving the shoes and shoes on the spot, the FIR disclosures revealed that the prosecutor had hidden the facts while filing the FIR, after his arrest. The suspects were not put on an identity test after their arrests to rule out the possibility of lying. The investigation into the involvement was completed to the extent of the accused and they were not required for the purpose. when you need a advocate from Morgah lawyer