SHAHID versus STATE
The Articles 426 (2A) and 496 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i) Sentencing Trial Court itself concluded that the applicant / accused was guilty of murder in this case. Did not share the shared object with. Some witnesses suffered injuries and were convicted by a trial court for an offense under Section 777A (i), PPC, which was a guaranteed offense, in cases of conviction of a guaranteed offense, the suspension of sentence as a right The sentence should be punished, otherwise the imprisonment period passed by the trial court against the applicants was very short and there was no possibility of hearing of the central appeal soon, the statements of the applicants approved by the trial court were suspended and Applicants were admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer
