Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD SAEED BHATTI

Section 2 (c) (I), Constitution of Pakistan (& 15) & (3 1973)), Article 185 Termination of tenant relationship of landlord and tenant tenant, denied the existence of landlord and tenant relationship They say they were not in the landlord's control. They were mentioned in the evacuation request, but they were occupying a different store. The question of identifying the shop, the landlord's lawyer, was repeatedly asked about the occupation and occupation of the tenants in the property that the landlord had claimed and not who had claimed the tenants, but the lawyer. Records failed to indicate that the tenant's shop was occupied by the landlord requesting eviction; the eviction request was simultaneously accepted by the tenant controller and the appellate authority, but the second appeal was high. The court rightly upset the decision. The two authorities below, held that the landlord could not prove the tenancy of the contract in addition to the legal contract. And the parties' contradictory claims regarding the title and question of the property demarcation, including that the High Court finding was unconstitutional, need not interfere with Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer