MUHAMMAD IBRAR versus STATE
Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article L85 (3) The prosecutor was successfully brought to the recorded ocular testimony of the prosecution's witnesses, which proves through the medical evidence that the accused's participation was proved in this case as well. He was injured in the incident, but admitted that he was shot dead in the exercise of his right to defend, and then the prosecution witnesses were injured with heavy and sharp weapons while the bad suspect and his father. One of the gunmen sustained a gunshot wound to the head and the other, the accuser, said his brother suffered three wounds from a two-sided weapon, Requested the defense. The main reason for this was that the weight of the High Court was lifted to reduce the conviction that the incident was not a foregone conclusion and the incident occurred at the door of the High Court Judge. The court was based on a proper assessment of the evidence to reduce the conviction of the accused and did not need interference. The CE approves the leave application for appeal to the Supreme Court against the reduction in the conviction of the accused. I was excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Sajawal lawyer