EXCISE APPEAL NO. 698/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. versus EXCISE APPEAL NO. 698/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 28TH SEPTEMBER, 2005.
Refund Claims under Section 3D Extra Duty Receipt, etc. In case of sale of liquor from 1/1991 to 6/1993 from 7 period 1994 to the claimants showing the refundable amount of Central Excise Duty, Was rejected on the basis of. It was unable to show that the incident of the Central Excise Duty was not delivered to the consumers and was not due to the refund under Section 3d of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for the period before 1993-1993. Can't be refunded The Judicial Officer refused to evaluate the failure of the excise duty on the application of section 3d of the Central Excise Act of 1944, claiming the article was inappropriate because, 1 The period before 1993 and the claims in question should have been examined on the basis of the provisions of section 3d of the Central Excise Act 1944.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kazi Ahmed lawyer
