Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN QURESHI versus MRS. SANJEEDA NUZHAT

The second appeals remand by a trial court for the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), sections 100 and AXLI, RR 23 and 24 suit possession, the dismissal of documents and the dismissal of a permanent order were decided by the trial court. ?????? The evidence presented before, but below, the appellate court set aside the judgment and order passed by the trial court and instead decided the case after ruling the case on the basis of the evidence on record. The trial court directed the trial court to proceed with the trial. Final Arguments and Trial After a fresh trial, the case was decided by the court after discussing all the evidence available on the record, and each case was discussed and the results recorded. It was not the case of either party that the evidence listed in this case was insufficient or there was no involvement to justify it. Or the remand of the case was needed because all the evidence on record was available, which was sufficient for the appellate court below to make the decision, so the appellate court needed to decide on the merits in the circumstances of the remand order, the law. The remand of the matter was not a routine matter, but the matter should be remanded only when the order of remand in compelling circumstances, in view of it, was against the delivery of the O XLI. R23, as CPC, which fought against the conditions contained in AXLI, CPC KR24, and passed it openly, violating the principles of law resolved by the Supreme Court remand order. Was illegal, and against the law advocate from Mohmand lawyer