Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF DAR versus UNIVERSAL LEASING CORPORATION LIMITED

O VI, R 2 The plaintiff, who was employed as executive director in a company, claims for damages in addition to the plaintiff's unpaid salaries and allowances, against the plaintiff's company. There was no worry or interference. The alleged fraud case by the company was arrested and since its arrest it has not been paid its salary and allowance and even the car retained by the company was reproduced by the company. Where the same company was acquired on a lease for the plaintiff because of a company failure. In order to pay the rent on a monthly lease to the leaseholder, the plaintiff claimed that his misappropriation in the fraudulent case was disgraceful to him and his family, so his claim for damages was found in the documents. The source proved that the plaintiff company did not calculate its salaries and allowances. For the relevant period the plaintiff failed to deny the case, in which case the plaintiff was entitled to his claim without regard to deductions in compensation, salaries and taxes deducted from the plaintiff's claim that it was appropriate for him. Due to the arrest, detention and trial of any wrongdoing he had to suffer, the High Court ruled in this case that the chargeable annual rate of interest, from the date of the filing of the suit to the receipt of the unpaid amount, 42 The amount of Rs. 50,598 top advocates from Farooqabad lawyer