Find a Lawyer

ATTA MUHAMMAD versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT, KARACHI AND OTHERS

Appellant service tribunal appellant opted for Golden Handshake scheme on retirement of Section 13 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Golden Hand Shakes Scheme, but this option was not accepted and consequently I continued to serve until he was dismissed. Disciplinary action against it was filed by the appellant in the Supreme Court against the appellant's order of dismissal from the service tribunal, which is pending the judgment of the appellant claiming that the Golden Hand Shake Scheme His option to retire was not accepted and he remained in the job and was entitled to an increase in salary declared for the employees unless his retirement was allowed under the Golden Handshake scheme. Appellant's option for retirement was not accepted and he remained in service until he appealed. Do not take the option of t was legally invalid and the appellant was not terminated illegally The benefits of the increase in the pay scale were attributable to the appellant's first increase in the pay scale announced during that period. I was in the service, but he was not entitled to a second increase in the pay scale that took effect after the appellant was removed from the job. The pay scale was not acceptable to the appellant because he was not in service at the time. \ R \ n family advocate from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer