ABDUL MAJEED SHEIKH versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD.
Article 199 Constitutional application of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan, Anti Corruption Court Inquiry Officer Report, charge of criminal action against the applicant on the basis of such allegation, employee removed from job misconduct, found the applicant innocent while waiting for the authorized authority. Suggested to do. Plea applicant pleaded guilty to removal of employment by the competent authority for the court's final decision, without issuing a show cause notice that the applicant could not be reinstated after reaching the instability age. Was. Accredited authority did not follow the inquiry officer's recommendations. Nor issued a show cause notice to the applicant, but he was obliged to wait and act on the decision of the unauthorized authority of the court, after which the Syed court acquitted the applicant, thus , It will not be considered a crime. And was soon responsible for reinstatement in the service. Although the petition was not entitled to reinstatement because of the age of adulthood, it would not lose the economic benefits to which he was entitled under the law, The High Court rejected the controversial order and observed that the applicant would be considered to be present in his service. Entitled to the date of retirement and age of employment and all benefits
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
